Random English Thought(s) Of The Day
I'm well aware that the majority of this blog's readership is American, so I don't propose to take up too much of your time. But at least some of you might want to know a few things about your first opponents in the World Cup this June, so here's my immediate take on tonight's victory over Egypt...
- For all that Fabio Capello has done for England - and that's an awful, awful lot - it may be time for fans to admit that his gifts don't necessarily extend to tactical innovation or sparks of creative genius. Consider the fact that Rooney is in the form of his life being played as an out-and-out striker, and that England have a plethora of midfielders but a lack of strikers. Perhaps you would think that an opportunity such as this would be perfect to try out a new formation - a Plan B, if you will - with Rooney at the front ahead of Gerrard, Milner and AN other (more on that in a sec). But Don Fabio was rigid in his approach - 4-4-2 / 4-4-1-1, with Rooney dropping deep and interchanging with Gerrard. It's not that the United number 10 can't play there (on the contrary, he's pretty fucking ace at it) but tonight was a chance to try something fresh, and for whatever reason, Capello opted not to.
- Theo Walcott is a terrible terrible footballer. In fact even calling him that is stretching it somewhat, because it implies he has some semblance of ability on the ball, which on current form he simply doesn't. I'm no particular fan of Shaun Wright-Phillips, but if his goal tonight does nothing other than keep ickle Theo further away from the England squad then that's fine by me. Forget Ashley Cole - every Englishman should put their hands together and pray that Aaron Lennon is fit this summer.
- Michael Carrick changed the game. Oh sure, Peter Crouch got the goal, but it was Carrick's assurity on the ball and his incisiveness which started to create opportunities for England. It's interesting that this, one of his better England showings, came when he had the similarly defensively minded Gareth Barry alongside him rather than the more attacking Frank Lampard. This basically mirrors the set-up Carrick enjoys at United when Fletcher is deployed alongside him, and suggests that while he's not suited to being the sole defensive midfielder for a side, he flourishes as a deep lying playmaker (think Pirlo or Alonso) with someone else to do the hustle and bustle.
- The two second choice full backs playing tonight both gave rubbish accounts of themselves in the first half but settled in to their roles in the second. Once Baines had gotten over his nerves he looked assured, and should Fabio Capello deem that a secondary left-back is needed or Ashley Cole remains injured then he'll probably grab a spot on the plane. Wes Brown however just isn't getting the games at right-back for United this season, starting at centre half instead. If there were any credible alternative then he might be in trouble, and we'll all be watching Micah Richards with interest throughout the rest of the season.
- The fact that Rob Green played every minute might suggest he's the new England number one. This should scare every England fan and lift the hearts of every American.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
Yep.
I’d agree with all that. It’s a shame for Defoe, but Rooney needs to be playing there, really, to be most effective. Crouch produced, as ever; he should be ahead of Heskey in the queue to be Rooney’s partner now, surely?
Walcott’s at an all-time low at the moment and should now be considered unready for the Finals. Lennon, SWP and Uncle Becj=kham can do the job just fine.
Lampard had a poor game but that’s nothing to be over-concerned about, the CBs were OK; Baines was OK in the second half, Brown is no Full Back, all our keepers are much of a muchness really. I’d still pick James, currently – I rate Robinson above Green to be honest.
Crouch over Heskey
Without question.
Not mediocre. Right about average
A bit unfair on Walcott
he’s been injured most of this season
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
And
he wasn’t very good. Both the above statements are true.
Unless he shows head-turning form between now and the squad being announced I don’t think he should be picked (unless Cap wants to take him as a fifth striker).
no I don't think he should be taken
but I think it’s unfair to write him off just yet
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
by firejerrynow on Mar 4, 2010 12:48 PM PST up reply actions
It's meant as slightly tongue in cheek, however...
…if I had to make a guess as to whether he’d ‘make it’ or not, I’d lean significantly towards the not.
I’ve never bought into Walcott as much as others have. I actually watched him being played up top in an England youth team about five years, and that night he wasn’t even the best English striker on the pitch, being comprehensively outshone by Daniel Sturridge. Obviously he has bags and bags of pace, and his performance in Croatia shows he has a decent hit on him (although I wouldn’t say he was clinical by any stretch). The key thing about that Zagreb performance was he had Wayne Rooney giving him the ball early and with space in front of him – in that situation, any slightly pacey winger is bound to do damage. But where he’s not getting the service or teams get tighter to him, he seems to struggle every time.
Basically, he seems to be a guy living off a stellar turn in a World Cup qualifying game and one pretty amazing run in the Champions League. Which is all very well and good, but David Healy’s done the former and Gabriel Obertan the latter, so that’s no barometer for long lasting success really.
England's Keeper...
I wouldn’t worry too much about England’s keeper against the USA. Anyone who watches the US team knows that the midfield play is horrible. While the US might be able to steal a point in that game, England will dominate possession and have a significantly more chances. The US will be unable to generate consistent pressure on England’s backline and/or keeper. It is likely that England’s keeper will only have to make 2 or 3 saves. Surely, there is someone on that island that can make 2 or 3 saves?
Never mistake effort for achievement.
All normal people love meat. If I went to a barbeque and there was no meat, I would say 'Yo Goober! Where's the meat?' - HJS
USA midfield play
isn’t the problem. Its the distribution out of the back four. They often panic and make bad clearances out of the back when they have easy outlets in the midfield. So the ball gets played from the back all the way up top and bypasses the midfield. The strikers then lose possession and the cycle repeats.
Touche.
Never mistake effort for achievement.
All normal people love meat. If I went to a barbeque and there was no meat, I would say 'Yo Goober! Where's the meat?' - HJS
by Esteban d' Amur on Mar 4, 2010 7:45 AM PST up reply actions
tactics
I agree regarding Rooney and the midfield. The other thing that is mystifying is the clear ability of Gerrard to play as a pure attacking midfielder. Run a midfield of Barry Carrick, Lamps, Lennon (or SWP) with Gerrard attacking and Rooney up top. I think that’s the stoutest lineup.
Not mediocre. Right about average
Completely agree
Gerrard was devastating behind Torres in the latter stages of last season in exactly that position. Rooney’s still not quite a Torres, but it’s the closest England will get.

by 








